New Existential Risks to Human Civilization: Interface Between Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and Biological Weapons
New Existential Risks to Human Civilization: Interface Between Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and Biological Weapons
The Normandy P5 initiative is inspired by the Normandy Manifesto for World Peace, which was issued at Caen, Normandy on 4 June 2019 by six thought leaders, including four Nobel Peace Laureates, from different parts of the world. It calls for saving humankind from an apocalypse which might be caused by weapons of mass destruction including nuclear, biological, genomic, chemical, and lethal autonomous weapons, at a time of erosion of global values, rise of ultra-nationalism and the danger of gradual surrendering of human control on deadly weapons to machines. The initiative is convened by Strategic Foresight Group (SFG), Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP), and Normandy for Peace Initiative of the Region Normandy.
The paper underscores the urgent need for strategic arms risk reduction dialogue between the P5 countries at a time when the strategic communication between the West and Russia as well as between the US and China has been suspended. However, the unfortunate deterioration of the last months should not prevent us from creating a soft infrastructure of ideas for a reformed global security architecture. The alternative is to allow the cold wars between big powers to trigger an incident or accident that could end human civilization.
Thomas Greminger, Executive Director of the Geneva Centre for Security Policy (GCSP)
Alexandra Matas, Director of International Security Dialogue of the Geneva Centre for Security Policy
Sundeep Waslekar, President of Strategic Foresight Group, co-chair
Ilmas Futehally, Co-founder, Executive Director and Vice President of Strategic Foresight Group
Disclaimer: This publication was originally published on Strategic Foresight Group. The views, information and opinions expressed in this publication are the author’s/authors’ own and do not necessarily reflect those of the GCSP or the members of its Foundation Council. The GCSP is not responsible for the accuracy of the information